Vote Sizing Institute

 I like people who think out of the box and challenge the status-quo. People who put forward new ideas and to help mankind live better. But having read and listened to what Mr. Awambeng has to say, I think the idea is ludicrous and insane. ( I have the right to free speech).
If you claim that rich people should be striped of their most basic rights as citizens, you are putting them out of the politicalⁱ process and discouraging hard work. You say that poorⁱ people should have more votes than rich people, that means, only the poor should vote. Don't the rich people have a voice? They are the ones who run the economyⁱ (private sector), they are entrepreneurs, governmentⁱ policy affects them and their businesses. So should they not elect the government to which they pay the most taxes? Or how about , no vote, not taxes. If the rich don't vote, then let them not pay taxes too. How then do you run the economy and country?
You make your argument on the supposition that most rich people are corrupt. Well that is very inaccurate. There are hardworking men and women who earn money through legitimate means. Should they not have the right to vote? And how about a country where there are very few poor people? Countries that have very high per capita income. Should they not vote at all?
It is good to think but some thinking can only plunge people into a dark age. 
That said, I laud you for that fact that you can summon the energy and resources to spread an idea. Maybe you should come up with something more meaningful that can be helpful to society. Educate people on the virtues of democracyⁱ, campaign for human rights, or try some other thing. But not this idea that people should be penalized for working hard and making money.