Invite a friend

Recommend Vote Sizing Institute to:
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

User login

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 23 guests online.
Home

Survey with Form 5 Students of STACO Douala

Thu, 11/05/2009 - 19:20 |  Awafong
Awafong's picture
Vote Sized Survey / Article, Multimedia / Appearance, Image(s), Opinion, Text, Video

Julius held this Survey on the 28th October at Staff College Douala (STACO) with form 5 students.

 

Plan
Surveyor Source: 
Author
Electorate Source: 
From website

Comments

Submitted by SteveG on Sun, 07/04/2010 - 11:57.

Findings:

5
Students who perform better depend less on the results, and on the teacher, than the students who eventually suffer from poor test. This shows, once again, that confidence self-esteem is more important to better performing students than what other people think about them.

  1. Counselors, psychologists, family structure and treatment at home are better tools than examinations

    Deviation: 8%
    from 26.62% to 34.73%

    (Binding) Counselors, psychologists, family structure and treatment at home are better tools than examinations

  2. The right teacher is the most important determination of quality of learning

    Deviation: 8%
    from 84.89% to 92.57%


    The right teacher is the most important determination of quality of learning

Students who achieve better grades are not motivated to compete, but simply to use their talents and energy to learn the most of what's being taught.

At the same time, they are not necessarily using their full potential to convey their skills onto the less capable.

  1. Competition best encourages learning

    Deviation: 7%
    from 86.55% to 93.91%

    Competition best encourages learning

     

  2. Cooperation best encourages learning

    Deviation: 5%
    from 85.51% to 90.52%
    Cooperation best encourages learning
The poorer performing students believe that they have something to offer society given the chance, and that vote sized learning will not punish both poor and fast performers; while better performing students in general think that poorer performing students don't have much to offer them, or society as a whole, and that ideas like vote sizing will only get in the way of the class.

  1. Poor performing students have something to offer school and society

    Deviation: 4%
    from 39.57% to 43.93%
    (Binding) Poor performing students have something to offer school and society

  2. Vote sized learning punish both poor and fast performers

    Deviation: 4%
    from 39.65% to 43.85%
    (Binding) Vote sized learning punish both poor and fast performers


     
   
   

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

About Awafong

9 years 36 weeks ago
2 days 56 min ago
Awafong

Latest comments

more

Copyright © 2008 Pali Productions Inc. - All rights reserved.