Vote Sizing Institute

In an English of about 180 students, Julius Awafongⁱ tried to sample out the opinion of students on what they think about Vote Size Learning. It's fascinating to know what they think, both fast and slow learners themselves.

--- Page Break ---

Outline

Outline

Environment	Academia
School	English Evening Classes
Class	English Language Class
Teacher	Awafong Julius
Project	English Language Performance
Order	Deviation (Ascending)
Wizard	Version: 2.03

--- Page Break ---

Statistics

Statistics

Students	153
Lowest Grade	10
Highest Grade	60
Total Grades	4800.5

--- Page Break ---

Valid Formula Text

Valid Formula Text

Statistic[ Students ]	153
Statistic[ Lowest Grade ]	10
Statistic[ Highest Grade ]	60
Statistic[ Total Grades ]	4800.5
Student[ Choice ]	Student dependant
Student[ Grade ]	Student dependant
Student[ Position ]	Student dependant
abs(	Absolute value
acos(	Arc cosine
acosh(	Inverse hyperbolic cosine
asin(	Arc sine
asinh(	Inverse hyperbolic sine
atan2(	Arc tangent of two variables
atan(	Arc tangent
atanh(	Inverse hyperbolic tangent
base_convert(	Convert a number between arbitrary bases
bindec(	Binary to decimal
ceil(	Round fractions up
cos(	Cosine
cosh(	Hyperbolic cosine
decbin(	Decimal to binary
dechex(	Decimal to hexadecimal
decoct(	Decimal to octal
deg2rad(	Converts the number in degrees to the radian equivalent
exp(	Calculates the exponent of e
expm1(	Returns exp(number) - 1, computed in a way that is accurate even when the value of number is close to zero
floor(	Round fractions down
fmod(	Returns the floating point remainder (modulo) of the division of the arguments
getrandmax(	Show largest possible random value
hexdec(	Hexadecimal to decimal
hypot(	Calculate the length of the hypotenuse of a right-angle triangle
Inverse(	*Special funtion* - Returns one over the value, or 1 if value is zero
is_finite(	Finds whether a value is a legal finite number
is_infinite(	Finds whether a value is infinite
is_nan(	Finds whether a value is not a number
lcg_value(	Combined linear congruential generator
log10(	Base-10 logarithm
log1p(	Returns log(1 + number), computed in a way that is accurate even when the value of number is close to zero
log(	Natural logarithm
max(	Find highest value
min(	Find lowest value
mt_getrandmax(	Show largest possible random value
mt_rand(	Generate a better random value
mt_srand(	Seed the better random number generator
octdec(	Octal to decimal
pi(	Get value of pi
pow(	Exponential expression
rad2deg(	Converts the radian number to the equivalent number in degrees
rand(	Generate a random integer
round(	Rounds a float
sin(	Sine
sinh(	Hyperbolic sine
sqrt(	Square root
srand(	Seed the random number generator
tan(	Tangent
tanh(	Hyperbolic tangent
0	1
1	2
2	3
3	4
4	5
5	6
6	7
7	8
8	9
9	0
.	Decimal Point
+	Addition
-	Subtraction
*	Multiplication
/	Division
(	Opening Bracket
)	Closing Bracket
,	Comma separator used in functions above

--- Page Break ---

Formulas

Formulas

{Traditional one-to-one vote}*	1
{Grade}	Student[ Grade ]
{Grade based vote}*	{Grade}
{Highest}	Statistic[ Highest Grade ]
{Lowest}	Statistic[ Lowest Grade ]
{Gap}	{Highest} - {Lowest}
{Achievement based vote}*	{Grade} - {Lowest}
{Inverse of achievement vote}*	{Highest} - {Grade}
{1+ inverse of achievement vote}*	1 + ( {Inverse of achievement vote} / {Gap} )
{Students}	Statistic[ Students ]
{Position}	Student[ Position ]
{Arc sized vote}*	sqrt( 1 - pow( {Position} / ( {Students} - 1 ), 2 ))
~Unused formulas (unable to get to work):
{Achievement based vote2}	{Grade} / {Highest}

*Charted

--- Page Break ---

Systems

Systems

Environment	Institution	Constituency	Pollster	Voter	Voters	Measurement	Measurements	Use
Academia	School	Class	Teacher	Student	Students	Grade	Grades	x
Political	Candidacy	Population	Pollster	Citizen	Citizens	Income	Incomes
Economical	Business	Employees	Employer	Employee	Employees	Salary	Salaries
Military	Department	Office	Commander	Soldier	Soldiers	Ranking	Rank
Judicial	Institution	Prisoners	Warden	Prisoner	Prisoners	Sentence	Sentences
Sports	League	Team	Coach	Player	Players	Score	Scores

--- Page Break ---

Filters

Filters

Chart:

Votes

Midpoint:

20% - 29% = ±Somewhat Disagree (Times used: 6)

30% - 39% = ±Somewhat Disagree (Times used: 14)

40% - 49% = ±Neutral (Times used: 10)

50% - 59% = ±Neutral (Times used: 6)

60% - 69% = ±Somewhat Agree (Times used: 14)

70% - 79% = ±Somewhat Agree (Times used: 4)

80% - 89% = ±Strongly Agree (Times used: 25)

90% - 99% = ±Strongly Agree (Times used: 5)

Deviation:

1% - 9% (Times used: 13)

10% - 19% (Times used: 1)

Formula:

Traditional one-to-one vote

Grade based vote

Achievement based vote

Inverse of achievement vote

1+ inverse of achievement vote

Arc sized vote

Question:

Practical experience is more important than theoretical intelligence

(Binding) Examinations are the best way to determine potential

(Binding) Theoretical intelligence is more important than practical experience

The right teacher is the most important determination of quality of learning

(Binding) Poor performing students have something to offer school and society

Cooperation best encourages learning

Competition best encourages learning

(Binding) Counselors, psychologists, family structure and treatment at home are better tools than examinations

Vote sized learning will only punish the fast learners

(Binding) Poor performing students will do better with more attention

(Binding) Vote sized learning punish both poor and fast performers

Evenly throughout students

Slower-learning students

(Binding) Faster-learning students

Miscellaneous:

Page Breaks

Condensed Output

Inline Charts

Monochrome

Chart:

Votes

Midpoint:

20% - 29% = ±Somewhat Disagree (Times used: 6)

30% - 39% = ±Somewhat Disagree (Times used: 14)

40% - 49% = ±Neutral (Times used: 10)

50% - 59% = ±Neutral (Times used: 6)

60% - 69% = ±Somewhat Agree (Times used: 14)

70% - 79% = ±Somewhat Agree (Times used: 4)

80% - 89% = ±Strongly Agree (Times used: 25)

90% - 99% = ±Strongly Agree (Times used: 5)

Deviation:

1% - 9% (Times used: 13)

10% - 19% (Times used: 1)

Formula:

Traditional one-to-one vote

Grade based vote

Achievement based vote

Inverse of achievement vote

1+ inverse of achievement vote

Arc sized vote

Question:

Practical experience is more important than theoretical intelligence

(Binding) Examinations are the best way to determine potential

(Binding) Theoretical intelligence is more important than practical experience

The right teacher is the most important determination of quality of learning

(Binding) Poor performing students have something to offer school and society

Cooperation best encourages learning

Competition best encourages learning

(Binding) Counselors, psychologists, family structure and treatment at home are better tools than examinations

Vote sized learning will only punish the fast learners

(Binding) Poor performing students will do better with more attention

(Binding) Vote sized learning punish both poor and fast performers

Evenly throughout students

Slower-learning students

(Binding) Faster-learning students

Miscellaneous:

Page Breaks

Condensed Output

Inline Charts

Monochrome

• Results

--- Page Break ---

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

Practical experience is more important than theoretical intelligence

Deviation: 0% from 85.22% to 85.49%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 128 to 20 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 85.29%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 4.04 thousand to 640 of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 85.37%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.76 thousand to 440 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 85.4%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 3.64 thousand to 560 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 85.22%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 200.89 to 31.2 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 85.27%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 100.55 to 15.23 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 85.49%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Examinations are the best way to determine potential

Deviation: 0% from 65.19% to 65.59%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 91 to 44 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 65.36%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.9 thousand to 1.41 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 65.51%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 1.99 thousand to 973 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 65.59%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 2.56 thousand to 1.23 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 65.19%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 142.15 to 68.54 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 65.3%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 70.6 to 34.07 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 65.2%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Theoretical intelligence is more important than practical experience

Deviation: 0% from 31.78% to 32.21%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Disagree 97 to 42 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 32.03%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Disagree 3.07 thousand to 1.33 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 31.86%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.1 thousand to 912 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 31.78%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.75 thousand to 1.19 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 32.21%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 151.93 to 65.76 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 32.09%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Disagree 75.73 to 32.73 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 32.11%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

The right teacher is the most important determination of quality of learning

Deviation: 1% from 83.97% to 84.77%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 115 to 10 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 84.31%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 3.61 thousand to 287.5 of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 84.63%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.46 thousand to 187.5 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 84.77%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 3.29 thousand to 312.5 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 83.97%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 180.76 to 16.25 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 84.19%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 90.44 to 8.19 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 84.22%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Poor performing students have something to offer school and society

Deviation: 1% from 28.22% to 29.46%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Disagree 99 to 34 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 28.76%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Disagree 3.09 thousand to 1.1 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 29.24%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.1 thousand to 758.5 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 29.46%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.85 thousand to 941.5 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 28.23%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 155.96 to 52.83 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 28.57%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Disagree 78.3 to 25.95 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 28.22%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

Cooperation best encourages learning

Deviation: 2% from 88.59% to 90.81%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 128 to 7 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 89.54%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 4.07 thousand to 190 of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 90.41%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.79 thousand to 120 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 90.81%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 3.61 thousand to 230 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 88.59%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 200.21 to 11.6 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 89.2%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 99.88 to 5.91 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 89.09%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

Competition best encourages learning

Deviation: 3% from 88.98% to 91.82%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 135 to 12 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 90.2%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 4.29 thousand to 320 of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 91.3%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.94 thousand to 200 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 91.82%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 3.81 thousand to 400 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 88.98%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 211.29 to 20 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 89.75%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 105.32 to 10.45 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 89.47%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Counselors, psychologists, family structure and treatment at home are better tools than examinations

Deviation: 3% from 32.33% to 35.22%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Disagree 84 to 35 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 33.99%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.74 thousand to 1.09 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 32.86%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Disagree 1.9 thousand to 740 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 32.33%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.3 thousand to 1.01 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 35.22%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 130.09 to 55.2 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 34.44%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Disagree 64.13 to 27.66 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 34.83%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

Vote sized learning will only punish the fast learners

Deviation: 3% from 53.94% to 56.95%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 70 to 54 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 55.23%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.28 thousand to 1.66 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 56.4%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 1.58 thousand to 1.12 thousand of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 56.95%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 1.92 thousand to 1.58 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 53.94%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 108.45 to 85.54 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 54.76%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 53.7 to 42.89 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 54.49%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Poor performing students will do better with more attention

Deviation: 3% from 82.02% to 85.09%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 122 to 20 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 83.33%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 3.93 thousand to 610 of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 84.53%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.71 thousand to 410 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 85.09%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 3.39 thousand to 590 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 82.02%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 189.89 to 31.8 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 82.85%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 94.25 to 15.89 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 82.6%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Vote sized learning punish both poor and fast performers

Deviation: 4% from 44.01% to 48.19%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Disagree 62 to 51 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 46.41%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.01 thousand to 1.51 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 44.78%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Disagree 1.39 thousand to 997 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 44.01%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 1.71 thousand to 1.55 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 48.19%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 96.23 to 82.06 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 47.06%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Disagree 47.36 to 41.93 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 47.74%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

Evenly throughout students

Deviation: 7% from 64.86% to 71.37%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 75 to 21 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 67.65%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.51 thousand to 575 of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 70.19%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 1.76 thousand to 365 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 71.37%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 1.99 thousand to 685 of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 64.86%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 114.74 to 34.7 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 66.63%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 56.3 to 18.27 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 65.82%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

Slower-learning students

Deviation: 8% from 63.53% to 71.63%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Agree 96 to 44 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 66.99%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Agree 3.18 thousand to 1.25 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 70.15%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Agree 2.22 thousand to 809.5 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 71.63%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 2.58 thousand to 1.39 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 63.53%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Agree 147.52 to 71.81 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 65.73%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Agree 72.48 to 36.91 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 64.8%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

--- Page Break ---

(Binding) Faster-learning students

Deviation: 11% from 37.03% to 47.7%

[+]

[-]

Traditional one-to-one vote:

Winner: Disagree 65 to 44 of 153 votes. Midpoint: 43.14%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Grade based vote:

Winner: Disagree 2.22 thousand to 1.16 thousand of 4.8 thousand votes. Midpoint: 38.98%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Achievement based vote:

Winner: Disagree 1.57 thousand to 720 of 3.27 thousand votes. Midpoint: 37.03%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 1.68 thousand to 1.48 thousand of 4.38 thousand votes. Midpoint: 47.7%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

1+ inverse of achievement vote:

Winner: Disagree 98.63 to 73.6 of 240.59 votes. Midpoint: 44.8%

[+]

[-]

[+]

[-]

Arc sized vote:

Winner: Disagree 47.76 to 38.28 of 120.19 votes. Midpoint: 46.06%

[+]

[-]

#Binding Question

--- Page Break ---